24 & 25 July 2019: Greece’s review by UN CAT [official transcript]

United Nations

Convention against Torture
and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment

Committee against Torture

Sixty-seventh session

Summary record of the 1761st meeting
(CAT/C/SR.1761 – Distr.: General – 31 July 2019)

Held at the Palais des Nations, Geneva, on Wednesday, 24 July 2019, at 10 a.m.

Chair:            Mr. Modvig


Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 19 of the Convention (continued)

Seventh periodic report of Greece

The meeting was called to order at 10 a.m.

Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 19 of the Convention (continued)

      Seventh periodic report of Greece (CAT/C/GRC/7 and CAT/C/GRC/QPR/7)

  1. At the invitation of the Chair, the delegation of Greece took places at the Committee table.
  2. Mr. Alexandris (Greece) said that, for the new Government, which had very recently taken office, the review of his country’s periodic report came at a time of transition in terms of decision-making, shaping of policies and new legislative initiatives. The fight against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment was a key priority of his Government.
  3. A policy to curb prison overcrowding through early conditional release schemes had been in place since the second half of 2014. The resulting 20 per cent reduction in the number of prisoners over the following two-year period had maintained the prison population at an affordable and manageable size. Other measures relating to prisons had included organizing educational, vocational, sporting and cultural activities for prisoners; heavily restricting the use of custodial measures for juveniles; granting disabled and seriously ill prisoners early release; and introducing legislative proposals to expand the use of community alternatives to imprisonment. Controlling the prison population was one of the main priorities of the current three-year strategic plan for the period 2018–2020, which sought to ensure respect for the human rights of prisoners and promote their social reintegration.
  4. The Ministry of Citizen Protection and the Hellenic Police Headquarters had made significant efforts to enhance their mechanisms for addressing violence and ill-treatment. Police officers were subject to strict disciplinary oversight and officers found guilty of acts that constituted torture or that undermined human dignity faced dismissal. Heavy sanctions could be imposed if such acts were found to be racially motivated. The Greek Ombudsman had been designated as the body responsible for investigating offences allegedly committed by law enforcement personnel.
  5. All persons deprived of their liberty were treated in a manner that respected their dignity. They were informed of their rights and permitted to contact their legal representatives and family members; and they had access to emergency health care, with particular attention being paid to vulnerable persons. The police and coast guard sought to ensure respect for human rights while managing the external borders of the European Union. Both bodies had been involved in search and rescue operations and had saved hundreds of migrants in danger at land and sea borders. Police officers were given specific instructions to protect the fundamental rights of migrants and refugees, particularly with regard to respecting human life and dignity, while upholding the principles of non-discrimination, non-refoulement and the legitimate use of force. All necessary steps had been taken to ensure that police procedures were conducted in accordance with national and international law. Police officers were constantly monitored and evaluated by their superiors to that end.
  6. In recent years, his country had seen an unprecedented influx of more than 1 million refugees and migrants. Although numbers had significantly decreased following the agreement reached between the European Union and Turkey in the EU-Turkey Statement of 18 March 2016, the Greek immigration system remained under intense pressure. Applications for international protection submitted to the Asylum Service had increased drastically since the Service’s establishment in 2013. On average, just under half of all applicants were granted refugee or subsidiary protection status. The Reception and Identification Service was responsible for identifying and registering non-European Union nationals and stateless persons entering the country and for providing information on the international protection, health care and psychological support available to all incoming refugees and migrants. The Service ran six Reception and Identification Centres located at the land border with Turkey and in the Eastern Aegean islands.
  7. The national authorities had carried out several cooperation projects and signed memorandums of understanding with international organizations and many non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in an effort to manage the migrant inflows. The Ministry of Labour, Social Security and Social Solidarity had enacted a framework for the guardianship of unaccompanied and separated children seeking international protection. A specific module on the protection of fundamental rights and the prevention of torture had been incorporated into the training curriculum of the Hellenic Coast Guard and an internal disciplinary mechanism had been put in place to deal with complaints of human rights violations.
  8. Greece was pursuing a comprehensive and victim-oriented action plan to combat trafficking in persons. Standard operating procedures were in place to address challenges such as the early identification of persons at a high risk of becoming victims of trafficking and exploitation, particularly unaccompanied minors. The Office of the National Rapporteur on Trafficking in Human Beings focused on the identification, protection, rehabilitation and integration of potential victims. Human trafficking indicators were used to assess the vulnerability of migrants registered in the Reception and Identification Centres. The national referral mechanism operated a number of shelters for victims of human trafficking.
  9. His country had ratified the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) in 2018, and the Ministry of Citizen Protection and the Hellenic Police Headquarters had set up a new department to deal with domestic violence issues. The General Secretariat for Gender Equality had implemented the National Action Plan on Gender Equality for the period 2016–2020, which included the National Programme on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women, with emphasis on supporting women from vulnerable social groups and victims of domestic violence. A comprehensive law on substantive gender equality had been adopted in 2019, which introduced gender mainstreaming and gender budgeting policies.
  10. The police force had established offices throughout the country charged with investigating acts of violence based on race, sexual orientation or gender identity and with raising awareness among police officers and the wider public. Data-collection mechanisms had been implemented in cooperation with the Ministry of Justice, Transparency and Human Rights. The National Council against Racism and Intolerance, an interministerial and multi-stakeholder body, had been tasked with drafting a national action plan to combat racism and intolerance. A law had been adopted that laid down minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime, in line with the European Union directive in that area. A number of initiatives had been developed to enhance the capacity-building of judges and prosecutors in diverse areas, such as dealing with racism and xenophobia.
  11. Mr. Rodríguez-Pinzón (Country Rapporteur) said that, according to alternative sources, the new Penal Code voted on by Parliament in June 2019 did not include a definition of torture in accordance with the Convention, as the Committee had requested in its concluding observations on the combined fifth and sixth periodic reports of Greece (CAT/C/GRC/CO/5-6, para. 9). Under the new Code, the definition seemed to apply only to instances of systematic torture rather than isolated cases. Furthermore, the new definition reduced the maximum sentence applicable to torture offences, retained the limitation period for such crimes and failed to refer to the consent or acquiescence of public officials. He would appreciate an explanation of the current status of the new Penal Code and he would welcome clarification as to whether the reported shortcomings were accurate. He wished to know why the definition of torture had not been brought into line with the Convention.
  12. Following its visits to places of deprivation of liberty in the country in 2017 and 2019, the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) had reported numerous shortcomings in terms of the treatment of persons deprived of their liberty, which included failing to inform detainees of their rights in a language that they could understand, denying such persons their right to contact relatives or access a lawyer and providing medical care only in emergency situations. The reports had also noted that protocols to be followed in the event of attempted suicide by inmates were lacking, no procedures had been put in place for the medical examination of new detainees and the privacy of detainees was not respected when they underwent examination in hospitals. He wished to know what measures the State party had adopted to tackle the issues highlighted by the CPT in line with its recommendations, and to enforce fundamental legal safeguards for all persons deprived of their liberty, including foreign detainees. He would be interested to know whether all persons deprived of their liberty were registered at the outset of detention and what steps the State party was taking to ensure detention registry entries were completed properly and in full. He would appreciate an explanation as to how the Government guaranteed the right of detained persons to be promptly presented to a judge.
  13. According to information available to the Committee, the revised Code of Criminal Procedure adopted in June 2016 provided for the same maximum period of pretrial detention as before, namely 18 months for adults and 5 months for minors, which conflicted with information given in the State party’s report (CAT/C/GRC/7, para. 22). He wondered whether the time limit on pretrial detention had indeed remained unchanged and, if so, he wished to know why the Law-drafting Committee had not amended that limit, particularly for minors. He would like to know whether there were instances where persons in pretrial detention were incarcerated with prisoners convicted of misdemeanours or commercial offences. He asked what measures the State party was taking to address the shortage of prison facilities and ensure that pretrial and convicted detainees were separated.
  14. He invited the delegation to comment on the reported disproportionate use of chemical substances to control groups of persons, abuse and excessive use of force by the police and persistent violence against refugees and asylum seekers, including unaccompanied minors, and to explain what preventive measures had been adopted.
  15. The State party’s conviction of just one perpetrator of torture was a cause for even greater concern in the light of the 25 cases of torture and 145 cases of physical attacks identified by the National Mechanism for the Investigation of Arbitrary Incidents (EMIDIPA) between June 2017 and December 2018. The vast majority of those cases involved the police, while the remainder involved the Hellenic Coast Guard. The CPT had also reported ill-treatment, particularly of foreigners, in police custody and in pre-deportation detention centres. Furthermore, EMIDIPA had identified shortcomings in the police investigations into such cases and had made recommendations to ensure their independence, impartiality and effectiveness. He wished to know what progress had been made in the investigations into the cases reported by EMIDIPA and the CPT, including whether proceedings had been launched and sanctions imposed on the perpetrators. He asked what specific measures, both judicial and administrative, had been adopted and whether victims were kept informed of the investigations and had obtained redress. He requested an update on the criminal proceedings against the police officers responsible for the killing of 15-year-old Alexis Gregoropoulos and asked whether his family had obtained redress or compensation.
  16. There were serious problems affecting the system for identifying migrant women who had been victims of sexual and gender-based violence, and it was reported that lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex individuals who had suffered torture and sexual violence in their countries of origin had been detained without appropriate gender-based separation, leaving them vulnerable to abuse by other detainees, including rape. Measures to prevent sexual and gender-based violence at the reception centres known as “hotspots” were insufficient. He therefore asked what measures were being adopted to establish effective mechanisms to evaluate sexual violence, what was being done to ensure that female victims could report such violence to the authorities and access abortion and emergency contraception in a timely and effective manner, and what additional security measures were being introduced to prevent sexual and gender-based violence in hotspots. Noting the report’s lack of specific statistics on violence against women, he asked whether that omission was due to a failure to collect such data, or whether it had been an oversight.
  17. The Committee welcomed the State party’s ratification of the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime and its Trafficking in Persons Protocol, as well as the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings. He requested data, disaggregated by year, on the number of reports lodged by victims of trafficking and on the compensation awarded to them, and an update on the information on trafficking provided in the report.
  18. While commending the State party’s efforts to align its norms and practices with European Union standards on asylum and the reception of refugees, as well as the significant resources allocated to increasing its capacity to deal with the influx of refugees and asylum seekers, he noted that areas of significant concern remained. Despite the State party’s claim that it had never violated the principle of non-refoulement and that none of the very few people to be returned to Turkey had been asylum seekers, the Committee had received reports that informal forced returns, known as pushbacks, had occurred as recently as 2018 and 2019, with Greek security forces using violence to intercept and expel asylum seekers, including children and pregnant women. Furthermore, the authorities had undertaken administrative investigations into hundreds of cases without involving victims or the NGOs that had reported the incidents, and there was a lack of judicial investigations into the alleged ill-treatment and forced returns. He asked what measures had been taken to prevent the forced return of asylum seekers, whether the monitoring of officials patrolling the border in Evros had increased, why administrative investigations did not involve victims or those who had reported the incidents and whether judicial proceedings, including criminal proceedings, had been launched, particularly in cases of alleged torture or ill-treatment. He requested statistics on expulsions and returns, disaggregated by age, sex and ethnicity, as well as updates to the statistics provided in the report.
  19. Although the reforms to the asylum system were welcome, it was still beset by a number of problems. There were reports of months-long delays to access the system for submitting asylum applications remotely, leaving asylum seekers at risk of arrest, detention and deportation. There were also shortcomings in interpreting services, and 60 per cent of asylum seekers attended their initial interviews without legal representation. Few officials were trained to determine whether an asylum seeker was a victim of torture and therefore eligible for transfer from a hotspot to the mainland. Moreover, the system afforded greater guarantees to those on the mainland than those in hotspots. He asked what short- and medium-term measures were planned to address those problems, particularly in hotspots, and requested confirmation of reports that persons arriving from countries predetermined as sources of economic migrants were automatically detained and deported.
  20. Noting that the CPT had observed that foreigners’ and unaccompanied minors’ deprivation of liberty did, in fact, exceed 25 days, despite the assurances to the contrary given by the State party in its report, he asked what legal consequences existed in those circumstances and how such situations were avoided. He requested information on the number of extradition, return and expulsion cases during the reporting period in which diplomatic assurances had been obtained, including details of the countries involved. Lastly, he asked whether, between 2012 and 2016, the State party had rejected any requests from a third State for the extradition of alleged perpetrators of torture and whether, as a result, it had launched its own criminal proceedings against those individuals. If so, he would welcome information on each case, including the results of the proceedings.
  21. Mr. Hani (Country Rapporteur) said that it was vitally important to bring the definition of torture in the State party’s Penal Code into line with the definition set out in the Convention.
  22. He would appreciate additional information on the training courses developed and implemented to ensure that all law enforcement personnel were fully aware of their obligations under the Convention. He wished to know whether a system was in place to assess such programmes on the basis of the effective reduction of cases of torture and ill-treatment. He welcomed the training seminars for prison guards on subjects such as mental health and prisoner reintegration and wished to know the percentage of probation officers, prison guards, law enforcement officers and coast guard personnel who had received such training. He would be grateful for updated information on the restructured training curricula for prison staff announced in the report and whether it would include specific instruction on the Convention and not only generic information on human rights obligations. He wished to know if the planned train-the-trainer programme for prosecutors to be provided by the Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe had actually taken place and whether the redesigned curriculum for prosecutors covered the inadmissibility of confessions obtained under torture.
  23. He would like to know whether clear instructions on the prohibition of torture similar to those provided to the Hellenic Coast Guard were also provided to other law enforcement personnel and if the instructions stipulated the sanctions for violations. He would like to know what training programmes on the Manual on the Effective Investigation and Documentation of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (Istanbul Protocol) were available for medical personnel and other persons working with detainees, particularly in the Reception and Identification Centres for migrants, and the number and percentage of doctors and other personnel who had received or were scheduled to receive such training. According to the National Commission for Human Rights, it had repeatedly proposed to provide training to law enforcement personnel on the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (Nelson Mandela Rules) and on the Istanbul Protocol but had not received a satisfactory response from the authorities. He wondered if the Government intended to remedy that lack of communication and consider accepting the training.
  24. He would appreciate information on the process and the frequency of inspections of Reception and Identification Centres and how such procedures prevented torture and ill-treatment, in the context of the new national legislation and the EU-Turkey Statement of 2016. He would like to hear the Government’s assessment of the actions taken pursuant to that statement, with respect to its obligations under the Convention.
  25. The Committee had received reports that the national preventive mechanism, established within the Office of the Ombudsman, did not have adequate staff or funding to fulfil its mandate under the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. The personnel came from other departments of the institution and had not received specific training on torture prevention through monitoring of places of deprivation of liberty. He would appreciate information on any plans to provide the national preventive mechanism with secure funding and appropriately trained personnel. He would like to know whether the budget was stable and regular and when it was received by the national preventive mechanism. He would be grateful for details on how the preventive mandate and the reactive mandate of the Ombudsman coexisted within the same institution. The national preventive mechanism also had a mandate to monitor forcible removals of foreign nationals. He wondered if that additional day-to-day work might hinder the capacity of the mechanism to find long-term systemic solutions under its basic preventive mandate.
  26. He asked how the Government coordinated the work of the human rights institutions that addressed the deprivation of liberty – the Office of the Ombudsman, which acted as the national preventive mechanism, and the National Commission for Human Rights, which was the national human rights institution – and how it ensured the effective implementation of their recommendations. He would like to understand how the monitoring by civil society organizations of places of deprivation of liberty, especially Reception and Identification Centres, worked in practice, and what was the role of the army in its coordination. Was there a long-term agreement for such monitoring or were the visits managed on a case-by-case basis? It would be useful to know the number of visits that had been carried out to detention centres, including Reception and Identification Centres, by the national preventive mechanism.
  27. Regarding general detention conditions, he would like to know the total number of prison doctors and the doctor-prisoner ratio. Given that rural prison facilities had been presented as a solution to prison overcrowding, he wished to know the criteria governing the transfer of prisoners from ordinary prisons to rural prisons and whether the experiment had been assessed for its impact on overcrowding, on detention conditions and on rehabilitation programmes. He wished to know the number of persons who had been detained in police stations and the average and maximum recorded durations of their detention. It would be useful to have statistics on the representation of minorities in the prison population.
  28. Although the Government had stated that migrants were not routinely detained, other sources had claimed otherwise. He would like to know the number or the percentage of migrants who were detained and any alternative measures taken or planned to reduce the use of such detention and ensure it became an exceptional measure, in line with international norms, such as revised deliberation No. 5 on deprivation of liberty of migrants of the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention.
  29. He would appreciate information on the reception conditions in the Reception and Identification Centres. The Committee had received reports that tents designed to hold 12 persons were sometimes shared by as many as 100 and that one particular camp had a maximum capacity of 648, yet accommodated more than 3,600 persons. He would like the delegation to comment on those figures and indicate the average length of stay in such centres, which were not designed for long residence periods, and their capacity. He wished to know what measures had been taken to improve the unacceptable conditions, which had been shown by Médecins sans frontières to cause new trauma to individuals who might already have suffered torture and had been described by the European Court of Human Rights as constituting degrading treatment, in violation of article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights and thus of the Convention against Torture.
  30. It would be helpful to have confirmation of reports that unaccompanied child migrants were held in custody for an average of 55–57 days in Reception and Identification Centres, and to learn what measures had been taken to rectify the situation, as such centres were not designed to accommodate children for long periods. He wished to know whether doctors received specific training on age determination techniques and whether they respected the principle of presumption of minority. He wished to know what was being done to address the lack of paediatricians on the islands where many children arrived, as reported by NGOs.
  31. He wished to know how many offences were punishable by life imprisonment and the number of persons sentenced to life imprisonment. He would be interested to hear the Government’s view on the “right to hope” endorsed in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, the principle that persons sentenced to life imprisonment must have the right to have a review of the sentence after a reasonable period, to be informed of that possibility as soon as possible after sentencing and to have access to rehabilitation programmes.
  32. He was concerned by the lack of a clear legal basis for involuntary placement in a psychiatric institution, as reported by the CPT. The two medical opinions required were often provided by doctors working in the same institution, who rarely disagreed. Placements were not systematically reviewed after the initial six-month period and the rights of patients to be heard personally at such reviews and to be informed of their rights were rarely respected. Patients were held for longer than the prescribed periods and psychiatric establishments were overcrowded and made excessive use of restraints without medical justification. He wished to know what measures had been taken to remedy such problems.
  33. The Committee had received information about a new policy to transfer mental health patients to community-based psychosocial rehabilitation units. He would appreciate confirmation of that policy and wished to know whether the necessary safeguards were in place, including training and requirements for the non-governmental and private organizations involved to abide by the Convention and other human rights instruments. There could be no transfer of responsibility from the State to private actors, because involuntary placement constituted a decision of deprivation of liberty taken by the State.
  34. Given reports of a monitoring gap for psychiatric establishments, he wished to know whether civil society organizations were able to visit such establishments and whether specific training on psychiatric institutions had been provided to the personnel of the national preventive mechanism. He would appreciate more details on the amendments to the law on involuntary placement that were being drafted. He wondered if the planned integration of Korydallos Psychiatric Hospital for Prisoners into the national health system had been implemented and any initial technical problems resolved. He wished to know how the Government would ensure that the civil society organizations that would offer primary psychiatric care to prisoners had the necessary competence. Had the Government assessed its experiment with remote psychiatric services and whether it worked in practice?
  35. He asked whether the Government had implemented the recommendations of the CPT regarding the frequent and widespread use of ill-treatment by police to obtain confessions.
  36. Turning to articles 12 and 13 of the Convention, he welcomed the designation of the Ombudsman as national mechanism for the investigation of incidents of ill-treatment committed by law enforcement and detention facility agents, an independent complaints mechanism, as reported in paragraph 29 of the State party’s report (CAT/C/GRC/7) and para. 100 of the common core document (HRI/CORE/GRC/2018). He would appreciate more information on the complaints procedure, and on the statistical data provided in paragraphs 177 to 180 of the periodic report on cases of violence against prisoners and disciplinary procedures, since the figures provided were incomplete and gave the impression that the State party did not always know how many criminal cases of violence or abuse by police officers submitted to the competent prosecutor had been pursued. He asked how many complaints had been made, how many of those cases had been heard, and what decisions had been made in terms of both judicial and disciplinary measures. In order to address the disappearance of 502 Albanian children in the case of the Agia Varvara Foundation, the State party should cooperate with the Albanian authorities to establish an effective investigation mechanism.
  37. Recalling the Committee’s general comment No. 3 (2012) on implementation of article 14 by States parties, he would appreciate an update on the development of the programme to support victims of torture and ill-treatment and their dependants. Did the Greek Government intend to make a contribution to the United Nations Voluntary Fund for Victims of Torture? Clarification was needed of whether victims of torture and ill-treatment were able to claim compensation, and if so, statistics and details of the relevant legal and administrative decisions should be provided. He requested details of the compensation provided to the victims of human rights violations recognized by the European Court of Human Rights and the United Nations Human Rights Committee, and asked whether those victims had received a written apology from the chief of the public service involved, and whether measures had been taken to make the related disciplinary proceedings public. An update should be provided on the implementation of general measures recommended in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights, and further details should be given of the practice of setting aside a judgment to ensure proper application of the law. Noting that one third of migrants were also victims of torture or ill-treatment, he asked what measures had been taken to provide rehabilitation support to migrants.
  38. With respect to article 15, and in view of the vague wording of article 177 of the Code of Criminal Procedure on the prohibition of using illegally acquired evidence in proceedings, he asked whether there were plans to amend the law to specify that evidence acquired through torture could not be invoked in criminal proceedings. Information would be appreciated on the number of cases in which evidence had been dismissed because it had been obtained illegally. It would be helpful to know whether, in practice, judges asked all defendants whether they had been subjected to torture or ill-treatment in detention, and whether persons who alleged torture or ill-treatment were assessed by a legal medical expert in accordance with the Manual on the Effective Investigation and Documentation of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (Istanbul Protocol). Statistics on that matter would be useful.
  39. Information should be provided about the legal framework criminalizing cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment, in line with article 16. Given that the national preventive mechanism considered centres for persons with disabilities to be places of deprivation of liberty, the delegation should explain how such places were monitored and whether the national preventive mechanism and civil society organizations were involved, whether staff received training on the provisions of the Convention and how infractions of its provisions were tackled.
  40. Information should be provided on how it was ensured that all body searches of prisoners were reasonable and necessary, and that they were performed using the least intrusive methods available, and whether the new cells constructed at Partas and Corfu prisons complied with the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (Nelson Mandela Rules).
  41. A number of persons claimed to have suffered harassment, persecution and detention by police and right-wing extremist groups on account of their activities in helping migrants as humanitarian workers or human rights defenders. He asked what action had been taken to end such harassment, and for information about the cases of Sara Mardini and Sean Binder, Mohammed Abbassi, Salam Aldeen, Manuel Blanco, José Enrique Rodríguez and Julio Latorre, and Panayote Dimitras.
  42. An explanation should be provided of the application of Act No. 4491 of 2017 on legal gender recognition with regard to intersex persons. In the light of reported violence against women from minority groups, he asked what measures had been taken to protect those women, particularly migrants and Muslim women. Information should also be provided on the action taken to tackle the reported racial profiling of Roma by the police and the overrepresentation of Roma in prisons. He asked what measures had been taken in response to two decisions by the European Court of Human Rights that had found the detention of children at police stations to violate their right to liberty and expose them to degrading conditions of detention. Data on the number of children detained in such conditions would be useful.
  43. In view of the ongoing development of an international manual on non-coercive investigation methods, he asked whether non-coercive investigation methods were used in the State party. Welcoming the State party’s role in the Alliance for Torture-Free Trade, he asked whether it had already begun work on that initiative.
  44. Mr. Heller Rouassant asked whether the recently formed Government of the State party envisaged any changes to human rights institutions or the approach to migrant and refugee issues.
  45. Ms. Belmir said that she would appreciate more information on reported cases of police violence against detainees from minority groups and minors. She also wished to know whether, in the light of the concerns expressed by the Committee about body search procedures in detention facilities (CAT/C/GRC/CO/5-6, para. 16), action had been taken to introduce non-invasive electronic detection methods.
  46. She would also appreciate receiving an explanation of the impact of the practice, described in paragraph 24 of the State party’s report (CAT/C/GRC/7), of allowing adult prisoners to remain in detention facilities for young offenders for work purposes, where they engaged in skilled jobs.
  47. Ms. Gaer, echoing the point raised by Ms. Belmir, asked specifically whether electronic methods were used to perform vaginal and anal cavity searches of women and men in prisons.
  48. The significant increase in attacks on migrants and Roma involving law enforcement officers gave cause for concern. With reference to the incident of April 2018 in Mytilene, on the island of Lesvos, in which it was reported that a peaceful refugee-led protest had been attacked by locals and many of the refugee protestors arrested, the delegation should explain what efforts had been made to address the incident and claims of ill-treatment by the police, and comment on information indicating that, despite the initiation of prosecutions for those attacks and the mass acquittal of the arrested refugee protestors, no testimonies had been taken, and that two of the persons accused of the attacks had been elected to municipal office.
  49. Mr. Hani said that updated information on the outcome of the public consultation on the new draft of the Correctional Code would be appreciated. The delegation should clarify whether appropriately qualified doctors, other than those working for the public health system or the military, could produce legal medical reports for victims of torture, given the provisions of Act No. 4540 of 2018. He asked for more information on the withdrawal of support allowances from persons with disabilities who were being held in prison.

The meeting rose at 12.45 p.m.

United Nations

Convention against Torture
and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment

Committee against Torture

Sixty-seventh session

Summary record of the 1764th meeting*
(CAT/C/SR.1764 – Distr.: General – 31 July 2019)

Held at the Palais des Nations, Geneva, on Thursday, 25 July 2019, at 3 p.m.

Chair:            Mr. Modvig


Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 19 of the Convention (continued)

Seventh periodic report of Greece (continued)

The meeting was called to order at 3 p.m.

Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 19 of the Convention (continued)

Seventh periodic report of Greece (continued) (CAT/C/GRC/7; CAT/C/GRC/QPR/7)

  1. At the invitation of the Chair, the delegation of Greece took places at the Committee table.
  2. Mr. Alexandris (Greece) said that human rights had been included in his mandate as Secretary-General of the Ministry of Justice and that he intended to spare no effort to protect and promote them. To that end, he would seek the guidance of the Committee and other United Nations human rights treaty bodies.
  3. Ms. Kourti (Greece) said that individuals were informed of their rights and the reason for their detention as soon as they were taken to a police station; special assistance was provided to persons who did not understand Greek, and all necessary information was provided to foreign nationals who applied for asylum. Detainees had guaranteed access to legal assistance irrespective of the type of procedure they were facing. Where necessary, detainees in need of medical services could be transferred to local medical facilities for treatment. All detainees were subject to registration, which covered their identity, the reasons for their detention and their health condition, and was continuously monitored. Minors could be placed in protective custody, on the orders of the prosecution service, while awaiting placement in a facility for juveniles. Protective custody was not considered as detention or arrest.
  4. The use of violence during investigations was prohibited. Interviews were duly recorded in writing, while ensuring the protection of personal information, and were conducted with a court secretary or second investigator present. Every step of an investigation was also recorded. Complaints of ill-treatment by police officers lodged by foreign nationals were investigated as a matter of priority. Crowd control measures, such as tear gas, were used only in open spaces and when considered absolutely necessary to protect police personnel and restore public order. Police personnel who committed human rights violations were held accountable by the criminal justice system and were also subject to strict disciplinary procedures. In addition, the Greek Ombudsman, as the national mechanism for the investigation of arbitrary incidents, investigated cases of misconduct and abuse of power by law enforcement bodies, thus serving as a further guarantee of the independence of investigations.
  5. In 2018, 29 administrative inquiries had been ordered in connection with complaints of torture and ill-treatment during police detention. Disciplinary proceedings had been terminated in seven of the cases and were pending for the rest. No criminal charges had been laid in 24 of the cases, while a police officer had been tried and acquitted in 1 case; the remaining cases had been referred to the prosecution service. Between 2017 and the present day, the Greek Ombudsman had dealt with more than 370 cases, 244 of which remained under examination. In three of the cases, lesser penalties had been imposed on the police officers involved. Every effort was made to avoid exceeding the limitation period applicable to cases of torture and ill-treatment. Disciplinary proceedings could be reopened when the officer concerned faced a fine or dismissal and the penalty imposed by the criminal court was also dismissal. In keeping with the Government’s zero-tolerance policy regarding human rights violations, instructions had been issued to all police personnel to preserve human life and dignity and prevent discrimination and torture. Non-compliance carried strict disciplinary sanctions.
  6. The curriculum of the Police Academy included courses on human rights. Seminars, webinars and lectures on topics such as fundamental rights and police ethics, managing diversity, hate crimes, refugee law and border controls were offered to police officers as well. Over 250 police officers had received such training every year since 2015. Furthermore, frontline personnel who dealt with domestic violence and human trafficking cases were provided with ongoing specialized training.
  7. Mr. Karageorgos (Greece) said that the registration procedure was the same for foreign nationals held in pre-removal centres and hotspots, and a special system was being developed with the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) to enhance the monitoring of migrants at all stages of the return process. As for fundamental legal safeguards, all migrants and refugees held in police facilities were informed of their rights and could communicate with the person of their choosing and access legal services throughout administrative procedures. They could receive visitors in designated private areas for a fixed amount of time that was the same for all. Communication with their lawyers was not time-barred, and efforts were made to provide them with free legal services through the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund. Migrants and refugees were always examined by a doctor, regardless of whether they were identified or apprehended at the border or once inside the country. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) provided essential support in that regard. It was not the police’s intent to violate the right to privacy during medical examinations; however, while migrants and refugees were under its responsibility, they could not move about unescorted. The presence of an officer was necessary only when the examination was performed in a space from which the person could conceivably escape.
  8. Complaints of ill-treatment during arrest or preliminary investigation were referred to the prosecution service or the competent lower court and had to be investigated by police officers belonging to a different unit than the one accused, in addition to the prosecutorial and judicial authorities. Reception facilities were equipped with metal detectors, which were used to inspect people and their belongings. Body searches were performed only when mechanical tools were broken or inadequate, for example in the search for drugs.
  9. Greece expended significant efforts to effectively control its borders in accordance with European Union and international law, with the technical support of various European agencies. When migrants were detected making an irregular crossing, all the usual procedures, namely apprehension, registration and custody, were applied. Under the readmission agreement with Turkey, the Greek authorities submitted a readmission request to their Turkish counterparts provided that no decision on an asylum application or other administrative procedure was pending with regard to the person concerned. Greece strived to enhance cooperation with Turkey on the implementation of the agreement. The possibility of breaches of the principle of non-refoulement was virtually eliminated by the presence of specialized Hellenic Police officers and staff from European Union member States at the borders. Nevertheless, any allegations of such a breach were thoroughly examined by the competent police service, as well as the Greek Ombudsman, who also monitored return operations. While some allegations of breaches had been confirmed, they should not overshadow the considerable efforts made to appropriately serve the thousands of migrants who were identified at the borders or were rescued from treacherous conditions along the Evros River.
  10. Regarding the incident of April 2018 on Lesvos island, the police had acted in accordance with their role to preserve the peace and bring to justice anyone who committed an unlawful act. On Samos island, tensions between groups of migrants or refugees occasionally escalated, causing concern for their well-being and that of the local inhabitants. In such situations, the police acted to protect the life and property of all individuals involved, using proportionate force where necessary. There was only one officially recognized minority in Greece, namely the Muslim minority in Thrace. The police did not resort to ethnic profiling of Roma, who were Greek citizens and enjoyed the same rights under national law.
  11. Ms. Kaplani (Greece), quoting from article 137A, said that the Penal Code defined as torture acts committed for a number of specific purposes, and provided for acts of physical or psychological violence that did not constitute torture per se but were nonetheless punishable and were considered a serious offence when they resulted in the victim’s death. In keeping with the general goal of reducing prison terms, the penalty for torture had been lowered to a term of 5 to 15 years’ imprisonment so as to ensure that perpetrators were effectively punished in accordance with the seriousness of the offence and did not ultimately avoid serving their full sentence owing to early release. Under the reform of penalties, the possibility of converting prison terms into pecuniary penalties had been abolished. Amendments to the Penal Code had introduced motives based, inter alia, on race, religion, ethnicity, sexual orientation and disability, as aggravating circumstances in relation to any offence. Furthermore, particular cruelty in the commission of an offence and the fact that a victim was unable to protect him or herself also had a bearing on the calculation of the penalty. The limitation period for acts of torture was 15 years, or 20 years when the act resulted in the death of the victim. The limitation was not intended to diminish the seriousness of the offence; on the contrary, it had been set to preserve legal certainty and to ensure that perpetrators were convicted on the basis of untainted evidence.
  12. Between 2012 and 2018, six cases of torture had been brought before the courts, leading to five convictions. Under article 137 (9) of the Penal Code, victims of torture and ill-treatment were entitled to sue the perpetrator and the State for compensation for the physical and psychological harm suffered and for property damage. The Integrated Civil and Penal Justice Case Management System, which had been rolled out in the four districts accounting for the majority of court cases, was designed to manage workflows, monitor the progress of cases and generate statistics and reports. The Ministry of Justice planned to expand its use to the rest of the country, though the System would have to be modified once the amended Penal Code entered into force. The authorities would endeavour to include data on compensation in the System.
  13. Criminal proceedings in connection with the case of Alexis Gregoropoulos were nearing completion. The court of appeal was expected to render a decision later that month. The victim’s mother and sister had eventually reached a settlement with the State for approximately 1 million euros, which had been disbursed in late 2017.
  14. The initial and in-service training of judges and prosecutors was a high priority for the Ministry of Justice. Further courses, including a programme on racism and seminars on migrants and refugees, the protection of minorities, persons with disabilities, minors, rulings of the European Court of Human Rights and trafficking, had been provided since 2017 pursuant to an agreement between the Supreme Court and the Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe. A special course on trafficking offences had been introduced in the curriculum of the National School of Judges in 2019, and a capacity-building unit had been set up in the Office of the Supreme Court Prosecutor in February 2018. Finally, judges and prosecutors took part in training sessions on various topics held by the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training, the European Judicial Training Network and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.
  15. Diplomatic assurances in extradition cases tended to be given at the time of submission of the extradition request and contained guarantees regarding the motives of the request and the treatment of the person in the requesting State. Greece typically denied extradition in cases where assurances were not provided or when the requesting State was not a party to the relevant conventions.
  16. Providing a statistical overview of cases of domestic violence, she said that the number of cases had risen between 2016 and 2018, but that the proportion of convictions had increased as well. The proportion of cases that went to mediation or in which legal aid was granted had fallen.
  17. Mr. Koulouris (Greece) said that detention was one of three measures available in the pretrial phase, together with restrictions and house arrest with electronic monitoring. It was intended as a last resort in the case of the most serious offences and when a person was likely to reoffend or fail to appear in court. About a quarter of all inmates were in pretrial detention; the continued appropriateness and duration of the measure were reviewed by the judicial authorities every six months or at the inmate’s request. Pretrial detention could never exceed 18 months, or 6 months in the case of juveniles between the ages of 15 and 18 years. There were currently nine juveniles, all boys, being held in pretrial detention or as convicted offenders. They were all in the same institution, separated from the adult inmates. The prison system did not currently allow for the separation of pretrial detainees and convicted offenders, owing in part to the prioritization of other separation criteria, namely age, sex, ethnicity, health and religion. In line with recommendations of the United Nations and the Council of Europe, Greece did not have a prison construction policy; therefore, the distribution of the prison population was conditioned by existing infrastructure and efforts to control its size.
  18. Since 2017, about 30 per cent of custodial and perimeter security officers had attended seminars on security issues, crisis management and social reintegration of prisoners. Training in operational security had been provided to more than 155 staff with the technical assistance of the Ministry of Justice of Austria, while administrative and health-care staff and probation officers had been provided with training, including on the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (Nelson Mandela Rules), in cooperation with the Council of Europe.
  19. The number of prisoners had been reduced by 20 per cent between 2014 and 2017 and had stabilized at between 10,000 and 10,500, though a recent uptick indicated that the potential of emergency early release measures was nearing exhaustion. The reorganization of the sentencing system and the reform of penalties were expected to help keep the prison population at a manageable level. The lower numbers improved detention conditions, in combination with the introduction of a range of educational, vocational, therapeutic and leisure activities for prisoners and the gradual enhancement of contact with the outside world.
  20. The draft Penitentiary Code had been submitted for public consultation but had not been forwarded to the Hellenic Parliament because the former Minister of Justice, Transparency and Human Rights had decided to prioritize the amendments to the Penal Code and Code of Criminal Procedure.
  21. Ms. Konsta (Greece) said that, to avoid invasive body searches, prisoners, staff and visitors were subject to metal detector searches and conventional drug tests in all prisons, while electronic drug detectors were also employed in certain establishments. In the event of the detection of illicit substances or items, the individual in question was transferred to a public hospital for the appropriate examinations. As a disciplinary measure, on the order of a public prosecutor, prisoners could be placed under close supervision in a special area of the prison for a period of 3 days while, for the most serious disciplinary offences, they could be held in solitary confinement for up to 10 days. Guidance had recently been issued to prison directors on their legal obligations regarding the cumulative effect of such measures on prisoners. Solitary confinement was only to be used in exceptional circumstances and was to be avoided when disciplining juvenile prisoners.
  22. With regard to sentenced prisoners with disabilities, such individuals were eligible for early conditional release on the basis of their disability. Their condition was also taken into consideration when allocating cells and work placements. Over the previous years, agricultural prisons had been used as a means of alleviating the burden on the country’s other prisons and of facilitating the social reintegration of prisoners. Prisoners were transferred to such facilities at their own request; the transfer decision was taken on the basis of the length of their sentence, the condition of their health, their disciplinary record and their social needs.
  23. Life sentences were being served by around one in nine convicted prisoners in Greece. Regarding their right to hope, those individuals had the right to appeal their sentence, were eligible for conditional release and, more generally, received the same treatment as other prisoners in terms of work and education opportunities, prison leave and participation in constructive activities.
  24. Ms. Christea (Greece) said that the national asylum system had undergone a major overhaul since the establishment of the Asylum Service in 2011. When the latter had become fully operational on 7 June 2013, the responsibility for managing the procedure for determining refugee status had passed from the police to the civil authorities. Since 2016, the Service had been working in close consultation with the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees to bring its work into line with international standards.
  25. Although the number of migrants arriving at the country’s borders had decreased since 2016, Greece remained under disproportionate migratory pressure. By 30 June 2019, approximately 235,000 claims for international protection had been registered by the Asylum Service and, according to recent data from the Statistical Office of the European Communities on first-time applicants, Greece was the fourth most common country of destination for asylum seekers. Since 2013, 450 victims of torture, rape or other serious forms of psychological, physical or sexual violence or exploitation had been granted international protection following an initial assessment of their application.
  26. Between 7 June 2013 and 30 April 2019, a total of 24,542 asylum applicants had been placed in detention. Third country nationals or stateless persons held in detention facilities or present at border crossing points received information on the possibility to submit an application for international protection. The Asylum Service, in cooperation with other stakeholders, ensured the provision of information on the possibility to submit an application for international protection and interpretation services were made available to facilitate that process. Where possible, organizations and persons providing advice and counselling to foreigners or stateless persons were given effective access to border crossing points. According to Greek legislation, foreigners or stateless persons who applied for international protection could not be held in detention for the sole reason that they had submitted an application for international protection and that they had entered irregularly or had stayed in the country without a legal residence permit. Fair and impartial treatment was guaranteed for all asylum seekers and appropriate operational criteria were applied to ensure that internationally specified safeguards were respected. The services of around 310 interpreters, working in a variety of languages, were provided on the Greek islands and continuous training was conducted with the personnel of the Asylum Service on subjects including evidence assessment, vulnerability assessment and the identification of torture victims.
  27. Ms. Siozou (Greece) said that support services, including psychosocial consultations, legal counselling and accommodation, were provided for women who suffered from multiple discriminations and their children. An interministerial protocol had been signed, defining a procedure for the identification of refugee women who were victims, or potential victims, of domestic violence. Under the protocol, which had been commended by the European Commission, 612 refugee women had benefited from counselling services, while 44 migrant women and 54 children had been provided with safe accommodation in shelters. The Government had also established a bilateral partnership with the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in Greece, which had led to the development of a number of joint initiatives to strengthen support for women refugees and their children in the country. Those included the publication of a brochure offering information on the services provided in each region and the translation of documentation on accommodation services into Arabic, Farsi, French, Urdu and Sorani. Similar projects to improve the protection of migrant women had also been initiated in partnership with the European Union.
  28. National legislation on domestic violence had undergone several amendments since the country’s ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) in 2018. For example, the offences of stalking and female genital mutilation had been criminalized and forced marriage had been added to the potential purposes of trafficking in human beings. Furthermore, foreign victims of domestic violence who reported an incident to the competent authorities were now protected from deportation. The groups protected by the provisions of the above-mentioned legislation included persons living together under a civil partnership, cohabiting or non-cohabiting partners and their children, divorced spouses, and members of a dissolved civil partnership.
  29. Ms. Stamkopoulou (Greece) said that all foreigners entering Greece irregularly and without legal documentation were sent to Reception and Identification Centres, where they were registered and underwent initial screening and nationality assessment procedures. Only under rare circumstances did the time taken for that initial registration exceed the 25 days allocated by law. That period could be extended if it was considered to be in the best interests of unaccompanied minors.
  30. Since the EU-Turkey Statement of 2016, the average length of stay at the centres had varied between two and nine months. Unaccompanied minors had been known to stay for up to eight months at centres on the islands of Lesvos and Samos, where processes ran more slowly owing to the high volume of migrant arrivals. The Government placed special emphasis on the support provided to migrant children. While staying at the centres, minors were placed in special safe zones where they benefited from additional security measures, the attention of dedicated personnel and the provision of recreational and educational activities. They were then transferred from the centres to special accommodation facilities on the islands or the mainland.
  31. The Reception and Identification Service worked in partnership with the Hellenic Police, the Hellenic Coast Guard and the Ministry of Health to ensure that the centres under its administration were safe and secure. The police were authorized to intervene in the event of violent incidents, while victims of violent treatment or crimes could address their complaints to the centre’s psychologists and social workers or to the local police branch. Each centre had a designated focal point for gender violence issues, who immediately reported all such incidents to the police. Any victims of rape or sexual harassment were taken to hospital, where they underwent a medical examination in accordance with the country’s protocol for clinical management of rape. If the victim was a minor, the case was also reported to the competent public prosecutor.
  32. Various measures had been taken to address the issue of overcrowding at the Centre on the island of Samos, including the improvement of the existing infrastructure, the transfer of vulnerable persons to the mainland and plans to relocate the Centre to a more suitable facility. The Reception and Identification Service placed great importance on the protection of the human rights of migrants and refugees. It therefore carried out special training courses for its frontline personnel on subjects including sexual violence, human trafficking, domestic violence, the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and intersex (LGBTQI) persons, and vulnerability and health issues. A total of 131 employees had been trained over the course of 76 specialized seminars.
  33. Mr. Fotopoulos (Greece) said that all unaccompanied minors underwent a provisional medical and psychosocial assessment. That procedure also included age determination techniques involving the analysis of anthropometric measurements in consideration of variations of ethnicity, race, nutritional intake and socioeconomic background. If the results were inconclusive, the minor was referred to a public hospital for further examination. In case of doubt, the person in question was regarded as a minor.
  34. In 2018, the Ministry of Health had issued a circular to all psychiatric institutions in the country on the subject of patient injuries. The institutions were instructed that all injuries must be recorded in both the patient’s medical record and a special record, that the doctor examining the patient should indicate whether the injury was indicative of possible ill-treatment or violence, and that all medical reports must be brought to the attention of the relevant prosecutor. In addition, the Ministry of Health had informed all private psychiatric institutions that the use of restraints was not permitted on their premises.
  35. Regarding involuntary placement in psychiatric institutions, work had begun on a draft law integrating the recommendations of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. Those included the implementation of the two distinct categories of “involuntary treatment in the community” and “involuntary hospitalization”, ensuring the objectivity of medical expertise through the provision of two separate psychiatric opinions for each case, holding court hearings in psychiatric institutions, providing patients with full information on their rights and a copy of any court decision on their involuntary placement, the application of a maximum hospitalization period of four months and the introduction of special provisions for minors in need of involuntary hospitalization.
  36. Prisons now benefited from the presence and services of permanent medical staff, while the medical offices at those institutions worked in consultation with the regional services of the health-care system. Furthermore, a number of doctors carried out visits to custodial institutions that had been contracted to provide prison services. With reference to the Committee’s specific question, the planned integration of Korydallos Psychiatric Hospital for Prisoners was still pending.
  37. Ms. Avraam (Greece) said that the new curriculum of the Hellenic Coast Guard Academy included training on the Convention against Torture. The training focused on methods of recognizing and identifying torture victims by observing behavioural and physical indicators, and placed particular emphasis on the attention provided to vulnerable groups such as torture survivors, victims of trafficking, pregnant women and children. The Hellenic Coast Guard also benefited from the cooperation of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in training matters and was in the process of training eight of its officials to become fully accredited human rights experts capable of delivering the curriculum. In the future, it also intended to develop an e-learning programme on human rights with a dedicated chapter on the Convention.
  38. Mr. Kofinas (Greece) said that, in 2018, the Government had adopted legislation establishing a mechanism for the appointment of guardians of unaccompanied minors. Those guardians were responsible for attending to the basic needs of unaccompanied minors, including representing them in administrative and judicial procedures. Suitable applicants were placed on a register of professional guardians and appointed by the competent public prosecutor. Inclusion on the register was dependent on the individuals meeting a series of criteria detailed in the above-mentioned legislation.
  39. Unaccompanied minors arriving in Greece were housed either in hotels, in cooperation with the International Organization for Migration, or in supervised apartments. Approximately 90 of the children who had disappeared from the Agia Varvara Foundation had been returned to their families in Albania, while approximately 65 had been placed in Greek social care centres or foster families. Efforts to prevent trafficking in persons would be stepped up, in cooperation with the Office of the Ombudsman and civil society stakeholders, through centralized administration of social care units, improved registration of data and action to prevent victimization of minors.
  40. With regard to the alleged withdrawal of support allowances from persons with disabilities who were being held in prison, a recent circular had established that detainees with disabilities were to be considered beneficiaries of disability benefits, given that jails were not hospitals offering medical treatment. In 2018, some 372 labour inspections had been carried out jointly by the Labour Inspectorate and the police, resulting in 113 administrative sanctions for violations of labour law in areas including undeclared work, workers’ pay and employment of minors without proper documentation. In 2019, some 347 inspections had been carried out, resulting in 82 administrative sanctions. Labour Inspectorate staff had attended training seminars on forced labour and how to combat trafficking in persons.
  41. Mr. Alexandris (Greece) said that there was no overlap of responsibilities between the different mechanisms operating under the Office of the Ombudsman. The Office had a broad mandate that was both preventive and reactive; it could receive complaints by individuals and also act on an ex officio basis. Efforts would continue to be made to ensure that the resources of the Office would allow the effective discharge of all its responsibilities. The National Commission for Human Rights – which had been established in full conformity with the Paris Principles – had a different mandate and did not handle individual complaints.
  42. Mr. Moskoff (Greece) said that the Office of the National Rapporteur on Trafficking in Human Beings was seeking to involve a greater number of frontline professionals in a more inclusive identification system for the early assistance of potential and presumed victims. Collaboration between law enforcement and the national referral mechanism was based on a “social” approach to the identification of victims that was informed by trauma and vulnerability considerations. Psychologists, social workers and other frontline professionals, for example in hospitals and labour inspectorates, provided valuable early assistance in that process. The Office of the National Rapporteur was working on an inter-agency national action plan aimed at, inter alia, reducing demand for trafficking in persons, early prevention of trafficking and raising public awareness of the issues involved. That human-rights based approach was similarly reflected in the way Greece reacted to challenges posed by the rulings handed down by the European Court of Human Rights, for example in Chowdury and Others v. Greece. That ruling had led to the stepping up of training and awareness-raising campaigns to prevent similar situations from occurring again, and the introduction of indicators to enable the Labour Inspectorate to better identify vulnerable persons. Following the case of the children who had gone missing from the Agia Varvara Foundation, a bilateral agreement on the humanitarian repatriation of children had been concluded with Albania, and two bilateral meetings with that country had been held. In mid-July 2019, representatives of his Office had met with the Albanian Deputy Minister of the Interior to discuss a possible agreement with Albania and two other neighbouring countries on transnational case management and capacity-building for frontline professionals, in order to better protect and assist potential victims of trafficking.
  43. Mr. Rodríguez-Pinzón said that the definition of torture was still problematic. It was incompatible with the definition in the Convention, since the description of torture as a “planned” act in the Criminal Code could restrict the scope of the crime and possibly exclude isolated offences. He would appreciate clarification of whether rape was classified as torture. He would also welcome confirmation of whether the maximum prison sentence for the crime of torture had been reduced from 20 to 10 years. Similarly, he wished to know more about the custodial sentences handed down in the five proceedings related to torture mentioned by the delegation. Had the five sentences in question been handed down by a first-instance court, for example, or were they final judgments? Also, did they all involve the crime of torture under article 137A of the Penal Code, or did some concern other crimes, such as ill-treatment? He would appreciate specific details of the sentences handed down.
  44. He wished to know what checks were in place to ensure that detention registers in prisons, police stations and migrant detention centres could not be altered after the fact. He would also like to know if a central database was kept in that regard, covering all three types of detention register.
  45. He had been concerned at the reports from various quarters regarding the excessive use of force by law enforcement officers against foreign detainees, and the lack of investigation thereof. The problem had been highlighted, for example, in the decision handed down on 11 July 2019 by the European Court of Human Rights in Sarwari and Others v. Greece. He called upon the State party to investigate such allegations in a more effective manner.
  46. It was important to provide all fundamental legal guarantees to detainees, including the guarantee of privacy for detainees undergoing medical examinations in public hospitals, in all circumstances. After listening to the delegation’s replies in that respect, he had the impression that that was not the case.
  47. He had been concerned at the reports of informal forced returns, known as pushbacks, which affected various nationals, including Turkish nationals possibly seeking asylum. In that regard, he wished to know what the specific role was of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (FRONTEX) in dealing with border controls.
  48. He still wished to know whether the family of the 15-year-old child who had been killed, Alexis Gregoropoulos, had obtained redress or compensation. He would also appreciate statistics relating to extraditions, including on the countries and the number of cases involved. He was very concerned about the alleged sexual assaults and rapes being committed against women, in Greece, in the reception centres known as “hotspots”; that was a very serious matter, for which preventive security measures needed to be implemented as a matter of urgency.
  49. He remained concerned at the reports of deplorable conditions in some of those hotspots, including overcrowding and a lack of basic facilities. The Moria Reception Centre on the island of Lesvos, for example, currently housed some 9,000 refugees, which was three times more than its intended capacity. Urgent, short-term measures were required to address that situation.
  50. Mr. Hani said he would appreciate information on the criteria used to calculate the capacity of the tents used at reception centres, bearing in mind reports that tents designed to hold 12 persons were sometimes shared by as many as 100. He also wished to know whether any investigations had been carried out into the excessive use of mechanical restraints in psychiatric institutions. He would be grateful for further information on the frequent and widespread use of ill-treatment by police to obtain confessions; in that regard he wished to know why the case concerning alleged ill-treatment in 2016 of three young Roma – Thanasis Panayotopoulos, Yannis Bekos and Vasilis Loukas – had reportedly been closed, despite the fact that the matter had been raised by the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights in a letter of concern to the Greek Government on 18 April 2017. He was still waiting for a reply to his request for an update on the implementation of general measures recommended in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights, and further details of the practice of setting aside a judgment to ensure proper application of the law. Similarly, he would appreciate the information he had requested on the specific cases of a number of human rights defenders who had alleged ill-treatment by the police.
  51. He would appreciate written data on complaints regarding police violence lodged with the national mechanism for the investigation of incidents of ill-treatment. He asked why only 3 out of 374 complaints had led to the imposition of penalties and would like details of those penalties. He would like more information concerning the detention conditions for minors held in police facilities. Conducting a medical examination of a detainee in the presence of a police officer constituted a violation of medical ethics and the privacy of the detainee in question. He asked whether another solution might be found to balance privacy and security issues, such as having the police officer wait outside the examination room.
  52. Recalling that international obligations prevailed over regional agreements, he asked what guarantees were in place to prevent refoulement and collective returns of migrants. He wondered what methods were used to calculate the capacity and personnel required for hosting migrants on the island of Lesvos, including migrant women and children, and whether staff were adequately trained to attend to those vulnerable groups. He would like more details on the special procedures for handling collective arrivals. He asked what measures were envisaged to reduce the duration of detention for migrant children in reception centres, which could be as long as 12 months and which went against the very nature of an asylum request. Could data be provided on alternative measures to returns, such as transfer and relocation of migrants?
  53. He wondered whether the Committee’s jurisprudence would be incorporated into training modules on the prevention of torture. He asked whether written data could be provided concerning the 502 Albanian Roma street children who had gone missing following their placement during the period 1998–2002 in the Agia Varvara children’s institution. He also wished to know whether the Government envisaged establishing a data-collection system concerning compensation and reparation awarded to victims of torture and ill-treatment, and whether data from the previous two years might be provided. He wondered whether extradition requests were assessed in the light of article 3 of the Convention and the Committee’s jurisprudence in that area. The principal aim of the Convention was to prevent, not redress, torture, and it was essential to carry out individual assessments of extradition cases, taking into account the general human rights situation in the destination country. It would be useful to know the percentage of prisoners who had been allowed to receive family visits. He asked whether prisoners serving a life sentence had the right to a judicial review after a certain period of time. Lastly, he wished to know whether the Government intended to contribute to the United Nations Voluntary Fund for Victims of Torture.
  54. Ms. Belmir said that the issue of police violence deserved more attention from the Government, as reports that torture was used in law enforcement and interrogations were alarming. Reports highlighted police brutality and excessive use of force against detainees, minors, migrants and sex workers. Expressing particular concern about extreme violence used against a minor during a demonstration, she wondered whether such violence was “necessary and legitimate”, as reported by a police officer who had been questioned about the incident. She asked whether such reports were true and would appreciate further details in that regard.

The meeting was suspended at 5.25 p.m. and resumed at 5.40 p.m.

  1. Mr. Kastanas (Greece) said that cases involving the adoption of both individual and general measures remained pending before the Council of Ministers of the European Union. Compensation had been paid as “just satisfaction” in the context of individual measures recommended by the European Court of Human Rights. In response to recommendations of that Court to adopt general measures, the Office of the Ombudsman had been designated as the competent authority to review allegations of arbitrary treatment by the police. It had full independence under the Constitution and was responsible for a broad range of functions, and was therefore an effective body for the prevention of human rights violations. The question of issuing apologies to victims applied only in cases of recommendations for individual measures and relevant cases should be assessed on a case-by-case basis. The conclusions of the Human Rights Committee following complaints submitted under the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, unlike those of the European Court of Human Rights, were not legally binding. Complainants had recourse to national judicial reviews, mediation and out-of-court settlements before the national Judicial Council. Such channels, however, had not been utilized by the complainants involved in the cases brought before the United Nations Human Rights Committee, which dated back some 20 to 30 years. There had been very few recent cases.
  2. Ms. Kourti (Greece) said that to date the National Mechanism for the Investigation of Arbitrary Incidents had handled 374 cases, 244 of which remained under examination. In three cases, penalties lower than the basic sanctions had been imposed on the police officers concerned.
  3. Mr. Karageorgos (Greece) said that the lack of adequate medical facilities for detainees in medical centres and hospitals was due to concerns about a lack of security and the impossibility of guaranteeing that detainees did not escape. Registration of migrants, refugees and asylum seekers at hotspots consisted of a screening procedure to identify their migratory status and nationality, and record the data in the Eurodac system. Those data could only be amended upon investigation or request of the asylum seeker to ensure more comprehensive and accurate records. The data collected during registration of detainees in police facilities were generally not subject to amendment; amendments could be made, however, provided the commander-in-chief and the police headquarters were informed.
  4. With funding under the national budget, additional border surveillance staff were assigned to hotspots where necessary to strengthen security in the case of tension or riots. The national authorities operating at the Greek borders had exclusive powers to, inter alia, implement action plans for border surveillance and control, and perform migrant return operations. It was not incumbent on officers of the European Police Office or the European Border and Coast Guard Agency to carry out those operations; they were employed instead to enhance the capacity of the Greek authorities. In addition, an internal complaints mechanism attached to the European Border and Coast Guard Agency served as a safeguard for respect of fundamental rights. While the 2002 readmission protocol with Turkey dealt with cooperation between Greece and Turkey relating to the management of migratory flows and returns, the readmission agreement signed between the European Union and Turkey in 2016 addressed the humanitarian crisis related to the current migration flows. Returns and readmissions were not carried out on a collective basis but were subject to individual assessments, as provided for in the protocol and agreement.
  5. Regarding cases of police violence committed against minors during demonstrations, it should be noted that most participants in anti-fascist or anarchist demonstrations covered their faces; where an arrestee was found to be a minor once he or she had been taken to police facilities, the appropriate procedures were followed. In any case, the national police did not use inappropriate force with respect to demonstrators.
  6. Ms. Stamkopoulou (Greece) said that the registration procedure was standardized across all hotspots and Reception and Identification Centres and all data collected were recorded in a single online database, overseen by the national police. The numbers of migrants arriving on the islands of Samos and Lesvos were three to four times greater than those of vulnerable migrants who were transferred to the mainland or relocated on the islands. For example, in July 2019, 140 vulnerable migrants had been transferred or relocated from Samos, while another 496 migrants had arrived there. Some 100 volunteers and NGO staff worked on Samos. The migratory flows to the other islands were not as significant and thus the situations were not as serious.
  7. Ms. Kaplani (Greece) said that penalties for acts of torture or violence committed by the police were scaled in accordance with the degree of the offence. The basic term of imprisonment of 5 to 10 years was increased to 10 to 15 years where there were aggravating circumstances and a life sentence in the case of the death of the victim. There were plans to include data on compensation for victims in the Integrated Civil and Penal Justice Case Management System, which was being developed to improve the data-collection process relating to prosecutions of violent crimes.
  8. Regarding the case of Chowdury and Others v. Greece, which had come before the European Court of Human Rights in 2017, the Supreme Civil and Criminal Court (Areios Pagos), in 2019, had accepted the application for the cassation of the acquittal judgment of the Patras Criminal Court, ruling that the Court had misinterpreted article 323A of the Penal Code. The ruling established jurisprudence for similar cases.
  9. Mr. Alexandris (Greece) said that his delegation looked forward to receiving the Committee’s concluding observations, which it would carefully examine and distribute to all relevant sectors of the Administration.

The meeting rose at 6.05 p.m.


27/07/2019: GHM and Ombudsman reports on Greece’s compliance with the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [from UN CRPD website]

Second Greek Helsinki Monitor Report on Greece’s compliance
with the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities


The Greek Ombudsman’s Report on the implementation of the UN Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities

Έκθεση του Συνηγόρου του Πολίτη για την εφαρμογή της Σύμβασης του ΟΗΕ για τα δικαιώματα των ατόμων με αναπηρία


Oral statement to UN CAT on Greece’s compliance with the Convention against Torture

IMG_20190723_181211NGOs after today’s briefing of the UN Committee against Torture


Address: P.O. Box 60820 GR-15304 Glyka Nera
Tel: (+30) 2103472259 Fax: (+30) 2106018760
 e-mail: panayotedimitras@gmail.com website: https://greekhelsinki.wordpress.com

Oral statement to UN CAT
on Greece’s compliance with the Convention against Torture

 23 July 2019

From the reports submitted to your Committee it is obvious that this year’s conclusions of CAT on Greece should be identical with the 2012 observations: “The Committee expresses its serious concern at persistent allegations of torture and ill-treatment by law enforcement officials during arrest or detention, including in the premises of the Criminal Investigation Departments (CID). The Committee is also concerned at the limited number of such cases that have been prosecuted, the very limited number of final convictions, and the lack of sanctions in cases with convictions due to mitigating circumstances etc. The Committee notes that this does not correspond to recent decisions and rulings from international bodies, including the Human Rights Committee and the European Court of Human Rights, as well as persistent allegations and extensive documentation received from other sources. The Committee also reiterates its concern at the continued reluctance of prosecutors to institute criminal proceedings under article 137A of the criminal code and that only one case has resulted in a conviction under this article.”

Things have only deteriorated since then. We have submitted to you well-documented evidence from a very large number of, mainly international, NGOs, corroborated by CPT, of more than 1,000 individual or group claims of ill-treatment and/or illegal destruction of documents and/or deportation in unprecedented systematic police violence and illegal deportation of asylum seekers in the Evros border area with Turkey in recent years. Until now the Greek Ombudsman, Hellenic Police and Prosecutors have persisted in rejecting all such claims after non-transparent internal investigations that have never involved the victims and/or the NGOs involved.

We have also provided you with details of a specific case that both the Human Rights Committee and the Council of Europe’s Commissioner for Human Rights have included in letters to Greek authorities. It concerns the torture in October 2016 of three Roma who have been denied a forensic examination even though both they and GHM have repeatedly requested it from all competent authorities. They have also not testified in the criminal investigation that has been pending since, while the administrative investigation by the Greek Ombudsman requested by GHM was summarily archived as the file was lost, without promptly informing GHM.

Additionally, we have provided the Committee with documentation on the continuing failure of Greek authorities to implement first the Makaratzis group of 13 ECtHR judgments holding Greece responsible for “the use of potentially lethal force by the police in the absence of an adequate legislative and administrative framework governing the use of firearms, torture and ill-treatment by police and coastguards and absence of adequate investigation, prosecution and remedy.” Greece has moreover failed to offer adequate remedies to the Roma vindicated by three HRCttee Views. Likewise, Greece continues to fail in its obligations, including answering a question by your Committee, related to the 502 missing Albanian Roma children.

Finally, we have reported to the Committee that Greece has failed to adapt the definition of torture to that of the Convention and to include rape therein, while the ensuing penalties for torture have been reduced, from 5-20 years to 5-10 years in new Penal code. Whereas there is grave concern about the widespread practice of police officers and prosecutors turning away women who seek to report alleged gender violence; frequently, subsequently, the perpetrators engaged in more violent if not fatal such actions against the same or other women.

Στο μικροσκόπιο του ΟΗΕ η Ελλάδα για τα βασανιστήρια (Επιτροπή κατά των Βασανιστηρίων – 23-25 Ιουλίου)

Στη σύνοδο της Επιτροπής του ΟΗΕ κατά των Βασανιστηρίων (CAT) που αρχίζει αύριο 22 Ιουλίου, εξετάζεται η Ελλάδα για τη (μη) εφαρμογή της αντίστοιχης Σύμβασης στις 23 Ιουλίου (ενημέρωση από ΜΚΟ μεταξύ των οποίων και το Ελληνικό Παρατηρητήριο των Συμφωνιών του Ελσίνκι – ΕΠΣΕ), 24 Ιουλίου (παρουσίαση από την Ελλάδα και ερωτήσεις από την Επιτροπή) και 25 Ιουλίου (απαντήσεις από την Ελλάδα και ενδεχόμενα νέες ερωτήσεις από την Επιτροπή). Οι καταληκτικές παρατηρήσεις και συστάσεις της CAT θα δημοσιοποιηθούν στις 9 Αυγούστου.

Στην ιστοσελίδα της CAT υπάρχουν οι ακόλουθες εκθέσεις από ΜΚΟ και (στο τέλος) την ΕΕΔΑ:

Greek Council for Refugees View document

Greek Helsinki Monitor; Minority Rights Group – Greece; Refugee Rights Europe; Coordinated Organizations and Communities for Roma Human Rights in Greece (SOKADRE); World Organization Against Torture (OMCT) View document View Appendix

Greek Helsinki Monitor; Minority Rights Group – Greece; Refugee Rights Europe; Coordinated Organizations and Communities for Roma Human Rights in Greece (SOKADRE); World Organization Against Torture (OMCT) – update View document

Human Rights Watch View document

Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) View document

Office for the Defense of Rights and Intersectionality (ODRI) View document

REDRESS View document

Survivosr2 Group View document

Greek National Commission for Human Rights
(NHRI) View document

Η Έκθεση της Ελλάδας:

State party report under LoIPR View document 

Annex to State party report View document

(Common) Core Document View document

Για τις προηγούμενες εξετάσεις της Ελλάδας από την CAT βλπ. εδώ και εδώ.


Guide to GHM on-line material on refugee and migrant human rights issues

RACIST CRIMES WATCH - Παρατηρητηριο Ρατσιστικων Εγκληματων


Check here our general report (many of the incident reports in it are in English) on push backs concerning more than 1000 cases of asylum seekers that were allegedly pushed back in Turkey. The data includes our direct documentation following online communication with asylum seekers, other Ngo reports, articles, social media posts offering specific documentation and, most importantly, a CPT report. The majority of the incidents took place near Evros Greece-Turkey border (and some others occurred in the sea) during the last 4 years. It is this link we officially forwarded to the Supreme Court prosecutor on 12/06/2019. Many allegations are also on ill-treatment, including torture, by the police or the army and/or unknown perpetrators. Some of the cases (those that were already well documented enough) had already been lodged to hate crime prosecutors. Those cases are 1) 02/06/2018: Push-back attempt concerning 35 asylum seekers (20 minors) by…

View original post 497 more words

Η Εφημερίδα των Συντακτών: «Αόρατη Ιστορία: Διαδρομές, βιώματα, πολιτικές των ΛΟΑΤΚΙ+ στην Ελλάδα»

«Αόρατη Ιστορία: Διαδρομές, βιώματα, πολιτικές των ΛΟΑΤΚΙ+ στην Ελλάδα»

FireShot Capture 111 - Από το 2005 μέχρι σήμερα_ Εκρηξη ακτιβιστικής δραστηριότητας και ενδο_ - www.efsyn.gr.jpg

Κυκλοφόρησε με την Εφημερίδα των Συντακτών –  Σαββατοκύριακο στις 8 Ιουνίου 2019.

Μπορείτε να διαβάσετε τα κείμενα σε ηλεκτρονική μορφή επιλέγοντας το αντίστοιχο λινκ από τον κατάλογο περιεχομένων που ακολουθεί ή να ξεφυλλίσετε και να διαβάσετε ολόκληρο το τεύχος στην εφαρμογή issuu μετά τον κατάλογο περιεχομένων.

Περιεχόμενα Τεύχους

● Εισαγωγή, σελ. 2
● Νίκος Μυλωνάς (συνέντευξη στο Θεοδόση Γκελτή), Ένας «φίλος της Ντόροθυ» στην Ελλάδα, σελ. 3
● Σόνια, Λεσβίωμα, σελ. 4
● Ι.Κ., Το ζητούμενο είναι το τέλος της ντροπής, σελ. 4
● Αρης Μπατσιούλας, 20th Century Boy, σελ. 5
● Ρηνιώ Συμεωνίδου, Το υπέροχα ποικιλόμορφο φάσμα του βιολογικού φύλου: Ιντερσεξ παιδιά και άνευ όρων αγάπη, σελ. 6
● Ελενα – Ολγα Χρηστίδη, Μεγαλώνοντας σε μια κουίρ οικογένεια τη δεκαετία του ‘90, σελ. 7
● Αννα Κουρουπού, Συγγρού… σελ. 8
● PASSPORT, Καμία ομοφοβική στολή, καμία τρανσφοβική εντολή, καμία ρατσιστική εξουσία, σελ. 9
● Μπέττυ Βακαλίδου, Το τρανς κίνημα όπως το έζησα, σελ. 10
● Θωμάς Ξωμερίτης, Ηρωική έξοδος, δύσκολη ελευθερία, σελ. 11
● Δήμητρα Τζανάκη, Από το 1871 μέχρι το 1950: Γενεαλογία φύλου και σεξουαλικότητας, σελ. 12-13
● Κώστας Γιαννακόπουλος, Μια διάχυτη ομοφυλοφιλία στη μεταπολεμική Ελλάδα, σελ. 14-15
● Θεοδόσης Γκελτής, Από το 1976 μέχρι το 1990, Το κίνημα για την απελευθέρωση της ομοφυλόφιλης επιθυμίας, σελ. 16-18
● Πάολα Ρεβενιώτη (συνέντευξη στο Θεοδόση Γκελτή), Όταν βάζεις τη φούστα δεν την ξαναβγάζεις, σελ. 18
● Χρήστος Ρούσος (συνέντευξη στο Θεοδόση Γκελτή), Στη φυλακή γνώρισα έρωτες που τους λέω κινηματογραφικούς, σελ. 19
● Ειρήνη Πετροπούλου, Από το 1990 μέχρι το 2004: Δράσεις, ορατότητα, συνεργασίες, σελ. 20 – 21
● Νέλη Καούνη, Από το 2005 μέχρι σήμερα: Εκρηξη ακτιβιστικής δραστηριότητας και ενδοσκόπηση, σελ. 22-25
● Λεσβιακή Ομάδα Αθήνας, 18 χρόνια, 700 συναντήσεις, σελ. 26
● Φίλιππος Παγάνης, Σπάζοντας το καλούπι, σελ. 27
● Γιώργος – Κυβέλη, Εξω από το δίπολο, σελ. 27
● Μενέλας, Επιζώντες της ετεροκανονικότητας: η πορνογραφία και εγώ, σελ. 28
● ΕΜΑΝΤΕΣ, ΛΟΑΤΚΙ+ πρόσφυγες: Μειονότητα μέσα στη μειονότητα, σελ. 29
● Νάνσυ Παπαθανασίου, Ελενα-Ολγα Χρηστίδη, Αμφισβητώντας την αυθεντία: τα κινήματα απέναντι στην «επιστήμη», σελ. 30-31
● Γιώργος Παπαδοπετράκης, Αντώνης Πούλιος, Το HIV/AIDS και η μετάδοση του στίγματος, σελ. 32-33
● Δέσποινα Χρονάκη, Κατασκευάζοντας τη μη ετεροκανονική συνθήκη στη δημοφιλή κουλτούρα, σελ. 34
● Γιώργος Σαμπατακάκης, Κουίρ σαν χώρα ή βγαίνοντας με κέφι από την ντουλάπα της Μεταπολίτευσης, σελ. 35
● Κωνσταντίνος Κυριακός, Για την ερωτική διαφορά στην ελληνική σκηνή: παραστάσεις με σημασία, σελ. 36-37
● Αν Πελεγκρίνι, Fuck Stonewall, σελ. 38-39
● Αλεξάνδρα Χαλκιά, Εχουν πράγματι αλλάξει τα πάντα;, σελ. 39
● Ελενα – Ολγα Χρηστίδη, Νάνσυ Παπαθανασίου, Ο δρόμος έχει τη δική σου ιστορία, σελ. 40

Επιστολή ΕΠΣΕ σε Πρόεδρο και Εισαγγελέα Αρείου Πάγου για ρατσιστικές διακρίσεις εις βάρος ΑμεΑ στα πλαίσια της εκλογικής διαδικασίας

Τ.Θ. 60820, 15304 Γλυκά Νερά, Τηλ. 2103472259 Fax: 2106018760
email: panayotedimitras@gmail.com ιστοσελίδα: https://greekhelsinki.wordpress.com

Κύριο Βασίλειο Πέππα – Πρόεδρο Αρείου Πάγου (Fax: 2106433799 – email: president@areiospagos.gr)
Κυρία Ξένη Δημητρίου-Βασιλοπούλου – Εισαγγελέα Αρείου Πάγου (Fax: 2106411523)

Θέμα: Ρατσιστικές διακρίσεις εις βάρος ΑμεΑ στα πλαίσια της εκλογικής διαδικασίας

29 Μαΐου 2019

Κύριε Πρόεδρε
Κυρία Εισαγγελέα

Σας μεταφέρουμε εδώ (σε συνέχεια και της επιστολής μας της 14 Απριλίου 2019 προς εσάς που επισυνάπτεται και αφορούσε τις θεσμικές ελλείψεις και την ευρύτερη ασυμβατότητα της ελληνικής νομοθεσίας και, κυρίως, πρακτικής με τη Σύμβαση των Ηνωμένων Εθνών για τα Δικαιώματα των Ατόμων με Αναπηρίες τα σχετικά άρθρα της οποίας αναφέρονται παρακάτω), μερικές από τις σοβαρότατες καταγγελίες πολιτών με αναπηρίες ή συνοδών τους, όπως αυτές καταγράφηκαν στις 26 Μαΐου 2019 στη δημόσια ομάδα του Facebook «Συνήγορος των ΑμεΑ» (https://www.facebook.com/groups/sinigoros.amea/). Οι καταγγελίες αυτές αφορούν ρατσιστικές διακρίσεις σε βάρος των ΑμεΑ που παραβιάζουν το δικαίωμα τους στην ισότιμη συμμετοχή στις εκλογές. Επιπλέον, πέρα από την ποινική ευθύνη κάποιων εκ των συμμετεχόντων-ουσών στη διαδικασία, επιβεβαιώνουν και το μέγεθος των προβλήματος που σας είχαμε εκθέσει. Αφενός τη σχεδόν παντελή έλλειψη προσβασιμότητας (σε κτίρια που είναι μάλιστα κυρίως σχολεία, αρά η μη προσβασιμότητά τους έχει και άλλες προφανείς συνέπειες) και αφετέρου τα προβλήματα που προκύπτουν από την απουσία νομοθετικών πρωτοβουλιών ή εγκυκλίων στην κατεύθυνση της (αναφερόμενης στη Σύμβαση) δυνατότητας τα ΑμεΑ να έχουν «τη βοήθεια κατά την ψηφοφορία, από ένα πρόσωπο της επιλογής τους» σε αντίθεση με την υπάρχουσα διαδικασία (αρωγής από δικαστικούς αντιπροσώπους) που παραβιάζει τόσο τη μυστικότητα όσο και την ελεύθερη βούληση των ψηφοφόρων.

Με την παρούσα αιτούμεθα την ποινική δίωξη όσων καταγγέλλονται στη συνέχεια πως παρέβησαν τη νομοθεσία ή/και προσέβαλαν τα ΑμεΑ και κυρίως την έκδοση από τον Άρειο Πάγο αυστηρής εγκυκλίου για το σεβασμό της Σύμβασης και των ΑμεΑ εάν είναι δυνατό και στο δεύτερο γύρο των περιφερειακών και δημοτικών εκλογών την επόμενη Κυριακή και οπωσδήποτε στις βουλευτικές εκλογές που αναγγέλθηκαν για Ιούνιο – Ιούλιο 2019.

Το ΕΠΣΕ θα αναφέρει τις ακόλουθες καταγγελίες και στην ειδική αντιπροσωπεία του ΟΑΣΕ που προεκλογικά επισκέφθηκε την Ελλάδα, για να εξετάσει τι είδους παρεμβάσεις θα χρειαστεί να κάνει και έκανε ήδη συστάσεις στη γραμμή της Σύμβασης (https://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/greece/420839?download=true).
1) Μ. K.
“Στο εκλογικό τμήμα που ψήφιζε η μητέρα μου ΑΜΕΑ με ενενήντα πέντε τοις εκατό αναπηρία έγινε το εξής…
Το τμήμα που ψήφιζε ήταν σε όροφο σχολείου χωρίς πρόσβαση για ΑΜΕΑ…
Αφού κατέθεσα την απόφαση των ΚΕΠΑ στον δικαστικό επιμελητή τον εκπρόσωπο του ελληνικού κράτους κατέβηκε κάτω με τα ψηφοδέλτια για Περιφέρεια και Ευρωβουλή…
Μου ζήτησε να απομακρυνθώ από κοντά του και ρώτησε την μητέρα μου τι θα ψηφίσει η οποία είναι τυφλή…
Με την άκρη του ματιού μου βλέπω να βάζει στο φάκελο ψηφοδέλτιο αλλού συνδυασμού και μάλιστα με σταυρό και σε άτομα της επιλογής του…
Ενώ η μητέρα μου του είχε πει αλλά…
Κατευθείαν όρμηξα του πήρα το ψηφοδέλτιο και παρουσίας μαρτύρων του λέω θα σε καταγγείλω.. μου απαντά ότι όταν είναι τυφλός ο ψηφοφόρος ότι έχει δικαίωμα αυτός να βάλει όποιον θέλει…
Δεν κρατήθηκα, έσκισα τον φάκελο και ζήτησα παρέμβαση της αστυνομίας.. ο κόσμος τον γιουχάριζε…
Αμέσως έδωσε εντολή και έφεραν νέα ψηφοδέλτια και φακέλους όπου και ψήφισε όπως επιθυμούσε η μητέρα μου ..μετά από παρέμβαση μου και όταν τον απείλησα με καταγγελία…
Στη συνέχεια του λέω θα έρθω να δω τι θα βάλεις στην κάλπη… Τον ακολούθησα και με έβριζε… Μου λέει τώρα τι θες να τα πετάξω από το παράθυρο; Του λέω τώρα τι θες να καλέσω κανάλια και να σε καταγγείλω; Χάρη μου λέει σας έκανα που κατέβηκα…
Του λέω πληρώνεσαι για αυτό και έφυγα…
Στη συνέχεια με τον ίδιο τρόπο απευθύνθηκα στην ακριβώς δίπλα αίθουσα για να ζητήσω την βοήθεια της δικαστικής επιμελήτριας για τις δημοτικές εκλογές… όπου ευγενέστατα η κυρία κατέβηκε και μου λέει αφού εξέτασε τα χαρτιά των ΚΕΠΑ και της απόφασης ότι δεν έχω την δικαστική επιμέλεια της μητέρας μου. λέει παραμείνετε δίπλα μου για να επιβεβαιώσετε όπως ο νόμος ορίζει ότι όντως ψήφισε όπως επιθυμούσε η μητέρα σας… Η ίδια δε μου ζήτησε να την ακολουθήσω για να επιβεβαιώσω ότι όντως έκανε σωστή χρήση των φακέλων… Της ανέφερα το συμβάν με τον συνάδελφό της και μου λέει ότι δεν είναι καν δικηγόρος αλλά υπάλληλος του υπουργείου…. το γεγονός θα το καταγγείλω με μάρτυρες βέβαια … Αλλά η ξεφτίλα τους πια δεν έχει όρια… Κανένας σεβασμός σε μια γυναίκα που ήθελε όπως όλοι οι Έλληνες να ασκήσει το εκλογικό της δικαίωμα…
Το εκλογικό τμήμα ήταν το 2546Α στο δεύτερο γυμνάσιο Περιστερίου…”

2) E.M. (σχόλιο στην παραπάνω ανάρτηση)
“Εγώ πήγα με την κόρη μου με το χαρτί της συμπαράστασης και η δικαστικός πήρε τον έφορο και μπροστά σε όλους ανέφερε ότι το παιδί έχει νοητικό πρόβλημα και κάνει επιληπτικές κρίσεις και δεν έφτανε αυτό, όταν μπήκαμε για να ψηφίσει μου λέει άντε τελείωνε γιατί παρατράβηξε αφού εσύ ψηφίζεις το παιδί έχει νοητικό.”

3) Σ.Σ. (σχόλιο στην παραπάνω ανάρτηση)
“Καλησπέρα σας, κ εγώ πήγα στο περιστέρι το παιδί μου να ψηφίσει με Ν υστέρηση , Απευθύνθηκα στο δικαστικό επιμελητή να συνοδεύσω το παιδί μου στο παραβάν διότι έχω δικαστική συμπαράσταση για τις Ευρωεκλογές κ περιφερειακές κ μου απάντησε πως δεν επιτρέπετε κ ότι θα το συνοδέψει εκείνος όπως κ έγινε, του εξήγησα πως το παιδί δεν γνωρίζει κ μου είπε θα το βοηθήσω εγώ στην ουσία ψήφισε αυτό που ήθελε αυτός, ΕΛΕΟΣ!!!! Ενώ οι κύριες δίπλα για τις Δημοτικές κ κοινοτικές φέρθηκαν άψογα στο παιδί μου …Δυστυχώς τα ΑΜΕΑ δεν έχουν δικαιώματα πουθενά!!”

4) Γ.Μ.
“Δε γράφω συχνά, αλλά σήμερα έχω νεύρα και θέλω γράφοντας να ηρεμήσω. Πριν δυο ώρες περίπου που πήγα να ασκήσω το εκλογικό μου δικαίωμα ο δικαστικός λειτουργός κάπνιζε μέσα στην αίθουσα. Όταν του είπα ότι απαγορεύεται μου είπε με ύφος εάν σας ενοχλεί να φέρεται τον αστυνομικό που βρίσκεται σε υπηρεσία στο εκλογικό κέντρο να μου κάνει σύσταση. Το οποίο και έπραξα. Όταν όμως ανεβήκαμε στην αίθουσα με τον αστυνομικό είχε σβήσει το τσιγάρο. Εκείνος είπε στον αστυνομικό πως δε μπορώ να απαγορεύσω σε κανένα να καπνίζει μέσα στην αίθουσα μιας και είναι από το πρωί εδώ. Τα υπόλοιπα μέλη ήταν εξαγριωμένα μαζί μου και είπαν πως εκείνοι κάπνιζαν! Και γενικά υπήρξε ένα bullying απέναντι μου μόνο και μόνο επειδή του είπα να μην καπνίζει. Ύφος κι απαξίωση, σπουδές αλλά όχι παιδεία, προσωπικό συμφέρον έναντι του κοινωνικού. Αυτή η χώρα δε θα αλλάξει ποτέ. Πήγα στο τμήμα για αναφορά. Την πήρα πίσω έπειτα από παράκληση ενός αστυνομικού. Έκανα λάθος. Ήταν η τελευταία φορά.”

5) Α.Κ.
“Καλησπέρα ομάδα μου. Σήμερα ντράπηκα για άλλη μια φορά που είμαι ΑΜΕΑ με 75% αναπηρία, όχι λόγω κινητικών προβλημάτων, αλλά αιματολογικών. Πήγα να ψηφίσω στην Αθήνα, περιοχή FIX – Ν. Κόσμος στην οδό Πύρρου 15. Είχε πολύ κόσμο και μπροστά μου ήταν τουλάχιστον 20 άτομα… Επειδή δεν μπορώ να στέκομαι για πολλή ώρα όρθια λόγω ιλίγγων, σκέφτηκα για πρώτη φορά να παρακάμψω την ουρά κ να δείξω σχετικά έγγραφα στον δικαστικό αντιπρόσωπο που πιστοποιούν πως είμαι ΑΜΕΑ, και να μου δώσουν προτεραιότητα, όπως ορίζει ο νομός. Έγινε αμέσως αποδεκτό το αίτημα μου, εξυπηρετήθηκα ΑΜΕΣΑ, αλλά ο κόσμος που παρέκαμψα άρχισε να φωνάζει κ να διαμαρτύρεται…Η δικαστική αντιπρόσωπος τους εξήγησε πως είμαι ΑΜΕΑ κ προηγούμαι, αλλά ο κόσμος συνέχισε να φωνάζει, και έτσι αναγκάστηκα να πάρω η ίδια το λόγο… με ανάγκασαν να τους εξηγήσω λεπτομερώς για την “υγεία μου”, και ντράπηκα πραγματικά, να απολογηθώ και να γνωστοποιήσω τα προσωπικά δεδομένα μου… Έτσι το βούλωσαν, αλλά εγώ έφυγα με σκυμμένο το κεφάλι… Παντελής έλλειψη παιδείας, μηδενικός σεβασμός, κακία…”

6) N.Π.
“Σήμερα πήγα να ψηφίσω στο 174β εκλογικό τμήμα δήμου Κιλελέρ, Λάρισα … την ώρα που κάναν διάλειμμα ζήτησα δείχνοντας την κάρτα μετακίνησης αμεα που είχα μαζί μου και που αναγράφει το ποσοστό αναπηρίας 79% (κεπα 79% και ΑΣΥΕ 81%) να ψηφίσω γιατί δεν μπορώ να περιμένω και η απάντηση ήταν ότι τώρα κάνουμε διάλειμμα και μου έκλεισαν την πόρτα στα μούτρα!!! Έκανα και εγώ και η οικογένεια μου μια καλή φασαρία και έφυγα χωρείς να ψηφίσω!! Που μπορώ να κάνω επώνυμη καταγγελία εναντίον της δικαστικής αντιπροσώπου που ήταν στο συγκεκριμένο τμήμα?”

7) Γ.Ν. (σχόλιο στην ανάρτηση της N.Π.) Ακριβώς το ίδιο έπαθα κι εγώ. Οταν φτάσαμε ήταν 2 άτομα που μόλις ψήφισαν κ βγήκε έξω ένα παιδί της εφορευτικής επιτροπής κ με κοίταξε, εγώ το γνώρισα, αυτός όμως δεν με γνώρισε, γιατί όταν έφυγα απ’ το χωριό ήταν πολύ μικρός.Να μην τα πολλυλογώ με διώξανε λέγοντας ότι κάνουν διάλειμμα, τους είπαμε ότι διανύσαμε 200χμ για να πάμε κ ότι είμαι κ ΑΜΕΑ, αλλά τίποτα.Πήρα τηλέφωνο στην αστυνομία της πόλης που ανήκουμε και μου είπαν:οτι έχουν δίκιο 😡😠😵

8) Γ.Μ. (σχόλιο στην ανάρτηση της Ν.Π.) Εκλογικό τμήμα Πειραιά Αφεντούλη ανέβηκα τρεις ορόφους με ΧΑΠ και πνευμονεκτομη λόγω χαλασμένου ασανσέρ έμεινα μισή ώρα στα σκαλιά να συνέλθω

9) Β.Π. (σχόλιο στην ανάρτηση της N.Π.) Εγώ σήμερα πήγα να ψηφίσω και δεν κατέβηκε η δικαστική λειτουργός την Τρίτη καταγγελία στη εισαγγελία Θεσσαλονίκης

Με τιμή
Παναγιώτης Δημητράς
Εκπρόσωπος ΕΠΣΕ


Τ.Θ. 60820, 15304 Γλυκά Νερά, Τηλ. 2103472259 Fax: 2106018760
email: panayotedimitras@gmail.com ιστοσελίδα: https://greekhelsinki.wordpress.com

Κύριο Βασίλειο Πέππα – Πρόεδρο Αρείου Πάγου
Κυρία Ξένη Δημητρίου-Βασιλοπούλου – Εισαγγελέα Αρείου Πάγου

Θέμα: Να αρθεί η παραβίαση δικαιωμάτων των ΑμεΑ σε ισότιμη συμμετοχή στις εκλογές!

(αρ. πρωτ. ΑΠ 1144/16-4-2019 και ΕισΑΠ 4500/15-4-2019) 14 Απριλίου 2019

Κύριε Πρόεδρε
Κυρία Εισαγγελέα

Σας αποστέλλουμε τη σημερινή δημόσια έκκληση για την άρση της παραβίασης δικαιωμάτων των ΑμεΑ σε ισότιμη συμμετοχή στις εκλογές στην οποία μεταξύ άλλων καθώς έχετε την τελική ευθύνη για τη νομιμότητα των εκλογών καλείσθε να παρέμβετε με τον πιο αποτελεσματικό τρόπο ώστε να εξασφαλιστεί πως οι πολλαπλές εκλογικές διαδικασίες του 2019 στην Ελλάδα να είναι για πρώτη φορά συμβατές με τη Σύμβαση των Ηνωμένων Εθνών για τα Δικαιώματα των Ατόμων με Αναπηρίες.

Με τιμή

Παναγιώτης Δημητράς
Εκπρόσωπος ΕΠΣΕ
Να αρθεί η παραβίαση δικαιωμάτων των ΑμεΑ σε ισότιμη συμμετοχή στις εκλογές!

14 Απριλίου 2019

Το Ελληνικό Παρατηρητήριο των Συμφωνιών του Ελσίνκι (ΕΠΣΕ) καταγγέλλει πως η εγκύκλιος του Υπουργείου Εσωτερικών “Διευκολύνσεις για την άσκηση του εκλογικού δικαιώματος από πολίτες με αναπηρία στις αυτοδιοικητικές εκλογές της 26ης Μαΐου 2019 και τις επαναληπτικές τους, καθώς και τις εκλογές για την ανάδειξη των μελών του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου της 26ης Μαΐου 2019” που δημοσιεύθηκε στις 12 Απριλίου 2019 δεν είναι συμβατή με τη Σύμβαση του ΟΗΕ για τα Δικαιώματα των Ατόμων με Αναπηρία και Προαιρετικό Πρωτόκολλο την οποία η Ελλάδα κύρωσε το 2012 και υποτίθεται πως εφαρμόζει πλήρως από το 2017 και η οποία προβλέπει:

Άρθρο 29 Συμμετοχή στην πολιτική και δημόσια ζωή

Τα Συμβαλλόμενα Κράτη εγγυώνται στα άτομα με αναπηρίες πολιτικά δικαιώματα και την ευκαιρία να τα απολαμβάνουν, σε ίση βάση με τους άλλους, και αναλαμβάνουν:
α. Να διασφαλίζουν ότι τα άτομα με αναπηρίες μπορούν να συμμετέχουν, αποτελεσματικά και πλήρως, στην πολιτική και δημόσια ζωή, σε ίση βάση με τους άλλους, άμεσα ή μέσω ελεύθερα εκλεγμένων αντιπροσώπων τους, συμπεριλαμβανομένου και του δικαιώματος και της ευκαιρίας, για τα άτομα με αναπηρίες, να ψηφίζουν και να εκλέγονται, μεταξύ άλλων:
i. Διασφαλίζοντας ότι οι διαδικασίες ψηφοφορίας, οι εγκαταστάσεις και τα υλικά είναι κατάλληλες, προσβάσιμες και εύκολες στην κατανόηση και χρήση,
ii. Προστατεύοντας το δικαίωμα των ατόμων με αναπηρίες να ψηφίζουν με μυστική ψηφοφορία σε εκλογές και δημόσια δημοψηφίσματα, χωρίς εκφοβισμό, και να θέτουν υποψηφιότητα στις εκλογές, να κατέχουν αποτελεσματικά αξιώματα και να ασκούν όλα τα δημόσια λειτουργήματα, σε όλα τα επίπεδα της κυβέρνησης, διευκολύνοντας τη χρήση των υποβοηθητικών και νέων τεχνολογιών, όπου αυτό απαιτείται,
iii. Εγγυώμενα την ελεύθερη έκφραση της βούλησης των ατόμων με αναπηρίες, ως ψηφοφόρων και, για το σκοπό αυτό, όπου είναι απαραίτητο, μετά από αίτημά τους, να επιτρέπουν τη βοήθεια κατά την ψηφοφορία, από ένα πρόσωπο της επιλογής τους.

Το βασικό δικαίωμα που προβλέπεται από τη Σύμβαση και δεν προβλέπεται από την εγκύκλιο είναι η βοήθεια κατά την ψηφοφορία από πρόσωπο επιλογής του ΑμεΑ κρίσιμη ιδιαίτερα για τα άτομα με προβλήματα όρασης. Η εγκύκλιος δεν προβλέπει τίποτα συγκεκριμένο για αυτά αλλά η πρακτική είναι να προσφέρουν βοήθεια δικαστικοί αντιπρόσωποι γεγονός που παραβιάζει τη μυστικότητα της ψήφου και δεν κατοχυρώνουν με τίποτε την έκφραση της πραγματικής βούλησης αυτών των ψηφοφόρων.

Αλλά και η πρόβλεψη να παραδίδει το ΑμεΑ φάκελο με το ψηφοδέλτιο της επιλογής του στο δικαστικό αντιπρόσωπο για να το βάλει ο τελευταίος στην κάλπη του μη προσβάσιμου εκλογικού τμήματος, αντί να υπάρχουν προσβάσιμα εκλογικά τμήματα παραβιάζει τόσο τη μυστικότητα όσο και την ελεύθερη βούληση των ψηφοφόρων.

Τέλος, δεν υπάρχει καμιά πρόνοια για την άσκηση του δικαιώματος ψήφου των ατόμων που δεν διαθέτουν δικαιοπρακτική ικανότητα που ενδεχόμενα απαιτεί και νομοθετική ρύθμιση.

Το ΕΠΣΕ ανέφερε όλα αυτά τα προβλήματα σε ειδική αντιπροσωπεία του ΟΑΣΕ που επισκέφθηκε την Ελλάδα την περασμένη εβδομάδα για να εξετάσει τι είδους παρεμβάσεις θα χρειαστεί να κάνει.

Καλούνται οι αρμόδιες αρχές και κυρίως ο Υπουργός Επικρατείας Χριστόφορος Βερναρδάκης υπεύθυνος του Συντονιστικού Μηχανισμού για την Αναπηρία, η Γενική Γραμματέας Ανθρώπινων Δικαιωμάτων Μαρία Γιαννακάκη ως Κεντρικό Σημείο Αναφοράς για θέματα σχετιζόμενα με την εφαρμογή της Σύμβασης των Ηνωμένων Εθνών για τα Δικαιώματα των Ατόμων με Αναπηρίες και ο Συνήγορος του Πολίτη ως Πλαίσιο για την προαγωγή εφαρμογής της Σύμβασης να παρέμβουν αμέσως για να αλλάξει η εγκύκλιος ώστε να γίνει συμβατή με τη Σύμβαση την εφαρμογή της οποίας στην Ελλάδα άλλωστε εξετάζει φέτος η αρμόδια Επιτροπή του ΟΗΕ για τα Δικαιώματα των Ατόμων με Αναπηρίες.

Επίσης, καλούνται η Εισαγγελία Αρείου Πάγου και ο Άρειος Πάγος που έχουν την τελική ευθύνη για τη νομιμότητα των εκλογών να παρέμβουν με τον πιο αποτελεσματικό τρόπο ώστε να εξασφαλιστεί πως οι πολλαπλές εκλογικές διαδικασίες του 2019 στην Ελλάδα να είναι για πρώτη φορά συμβατές με τη Σύμβαση των Ηνωμένων Εθνών για τα Δικαιώματα των Ατόμων με Αναπηρίες.

Χρήσιμοι γενικοί οδηγοί είναι το Handbook on Observing and Promoting the Electoral Participation of Persons with Disabilities του ΟΑΣΕ και ο οδηγός για Το δικαίωμα πολιτικής συμμετοχής των ατόμων με αναπηρία του Οργανισμού Θεμελιωδών Δικαιωμάτων της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης (FRA).

Υπενθυμίζεται τέλος πως ήδη από το 2012 ο ΟΑΣΕ είχε ζητήσει από την Ελλάδα, η οποία φυσικά αγνόησε τη σύσταση αυτή:

Υπό το πρίσμα της πρόσφατης κύρωσης της Σύμβασης των Ηνωμένων Εθνών για τα Δικαιώματα των Ατόμων με Αναπηρίες από την Ελλάδα και προκειμένου να διασφαλιστεί το απόρρητο της ψηφοφορίας, θα πρέπει να εισαχθούν τροποποιήσεις στην ισχύουσα νομοθεσία ώστε να επιβάλλεται η πρόσβαση των εκλογέων με αναπηρίες στα εκλογικά τμήματα και να επιτρέπεται σε αυτούς τους ψηφοφόρους να επιλέγουν παρόχους βοήθειας της επιλογής τους.